Transport Trumps

South West

Let's play Transport Trumps in the South West.

Problem 1: There’s a lot of traffic in Weymouth

Top image
Weymouth Relief Road
Demonstration against road
Community improvement = 2
Environmental sustainability = 1
Cost-effectiveness = 2
Bottom image
Road solution: Dorset County Council is planning to spend £85.4 million to build a 3.75-mile road north of Weymouth - that’s £22.8 million a mile. The road would greatly damage an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, a Site of Special Scientific Interest and ancient woodland and cut a deep gash in the Ridgeway. The road would increase CO2 - adding 2,347 tonnes in just its first year.
Top image
Better public transport
Countryside near Weymouth
Community improvement = 5
Environmental sustainability = 8
Cost-effectiveness = 5
Bottom image
Public transport solution: Local people have been proposing a package of public transport improvements to eliminate the need for a new road, including construction of cycleway; a fully integrated bus system for the Weymouth–Dorchester corridor; bus lanes and improvements to bus services, bus stops and bus information services; new and improved rail services and a public transport interchange at Weymouth railway station.
Contact us if you can trump this solution

**Result: Public transport solution trumps road solution!**



Problem 2: Parts of Taunton are congested

Top image
Northern Inner Distributor Rd
Northern Inner Distributor Road
Community improvement = 3
Environmental sustainability = 2
Cost-effectiveness = 1
Bottom image
Road solution: Somerset County Council wants to spend £30 million to build a one-mile road through Taunton. The road would encourage car-based development and increase traffic.
Trump card
Have you got a better solution?
Tell us how you'd trump this road



Problem 3: There’s a lot of traffic in Westbury

Top image
A350 Westbury Bypass
Impression of road
Community improvement = 1
Environmental sustainability = 1
Cost-effectiveness = 2
Bottom image
Road solution: Wiltshire County Council wants to spend £28.1 million to build a 2.8 mile road – that’s £10 million a mile – to the east of Westbury, passing underneath one of the famous White Horses on Salisbury Plain. The road would destroy a scenic area and hurt local wildlife including 13 species of bat and several red-listed bird species. It would increase CO2 emissions due to higher levels of traffic.
Top image
Better train service
Reader's suggestion
Community improvement = 5
Environmental sustainability = 4
Cost-effectiveness = 5
Bottom image
Reader's suggestion: Pete Brown (one of our web visitors) thinks a good traffic-busting plan would be to establish an hourly local train service between Salisbury and Swindon via Westbury, Warminster, Trowbridge, Melksham and Chippenham – and to integrate the local buses so they connect with the trains. (Save the Train is campaigning for this too). The proposal would reduce pollution on the A350 corridor and curtail urban sprawl.
Contact us if you can trump this solution

**Result: Public transport solution trumps road solution!**



Problem 4: There’s a lot of traffic in Bristol

Top image
South Bristol Ring Road
Traffic
Community improvement = 0
Environmental sustainability = 1
Cost-effectiveness = 2
Bottom image
Road solution: Bristol City Council wants to spend £20 million to build a 9-mile dual carriageway in south Bristol. The road would destroy parts of the Green Belt, sever communities in South Bristol and increase traffic, traffic noise and C02.
Top image
Strategic public transport
Reader's suggestion
Community improvement = 7
Environmental sustainability = 6
Cost-effectiveness = 4
Bottom image
Reader's suggestion: The Transport for Greater Bristol Alliance (TfGB) wants an ultra-light tram system for the city, and a strategic approach to public transport through a 10-year strategy to reopen rail stations and lines. The group also calls for the creation of an integrated transport authority with sufficient powers and funding to improve the bus and rail networks. The group’s proposal would reduce CO2, noise, air pollution and car dependency and protect green spaces.
Contact us if you can trump this solution

**Result: Public transport solution trumps road solution!**



Problem 5: There’s a lot of traffic in Kingskerswell

Top image
Kingskerswell Bypass
Impression of road
Community improvement = 3
Environmental sustainability = 2
Cost-effectiveness = 1
Bottom image
Road solution: Devon County Council wants to spend £129 million to build a 5-kilometre dual carriageway between Penn Inn and the Torbay Ring Road at Kerswell Gardens. The road would increase C02 – adding 9,200 tonnes in the first year alone. The council expects traffic to increase because 600 more homes would be built along the route, adding 1,000 new cars to the area.
Top image
Rail shuttle service
Reader's suggestion
Community improvement = 5
Environmental sustainability = 5
Cost-effectiveness = 8
Bottom image
Reader's suggestion: Ben Hughes (one of our web visitors) thinks a shuttle train service should be introduced, running every 15 minutes from Newton Abbot to Paignton – with possible extension to Exeter and Exmouth. Four new two-car trains would be required – costing just £6 million. Local bus routes would be revised where required to link up to the railway. His proposal, providing an attractive rail service for almost 100,000 people, would reduce traffic and congestion inside the towns, improving air quality and reducing CO2 emissions.
Contact us if you can trump this solution

**Result: Public transport solution trumps road solution!**


Do you know of other proposed road schemes in the South West that could be trumped? If so, we want to hear about them!

In the real world of Transport Trumps, transport schemes are assessed through a cost-benefit analysis. We think the analysis is flawed because roads always come out as Top Trumps.

Go back to main Transport Trumps page

Last updated: 10 October 2008

Campaign for Better Transport Charitable Trust is a charity (1101929) and a company limited by guarantee (4943428)